01

Challenge

Challenge

Network planners were juggling 5-6 disconnected tools daily: historical performance analytics, route planning interfaces, demographic data dashboards, profitability calculators, and operations research optimisation systems. This constant tool switching created significant workflow inefficiencies, with each system lacking contextual awareness of the others, resulting in complex onboarding processes and frequent user errors.

Design Inconsistency Crisis

Design Inconsistency Crisis

Each tool featured completely different visual designs, layouts, and terminology: the same functionality would be labeled “Route A” in one system and “Line B” in another, creating cognitive confusion and increasing learning curves for both experienced planners and new hires.

Technical vs. UX Tension

Technical vs. UX Tension

The tools were originally developed in isolation by separate engineering teams prioritising technical simplicity over user experience, creating a core challenge: finding the optimal balance between minimising development dependencies while maximising UX improvements: requiring case-by-case strategic decisions.

Why This Problem Demanded Immediate Action

Why This Problem Demanded Immediate Action

Workflow inefficiencies were causing planning errors, long onboarding times, and low productivity: issues that, given FlixBus’s 2,500+ destinations across 35+ countries, translated into significant operational costs and missed optimisation opportunities. The business goal was to boost efficiency so fewer planners could manage more routes with fewer errors, while the key constraint was balancing ongoing maintenance of existing tools with the resources needed to build and roll out the new unified interface.

The target persona
Sample of user journey
02

Process

Process

  • Initiated with in-depth user interviews and contextual shadowing, distilling thousands of post-its through affinity mapping to surface critical workflow bottlenecks.

  • Presented these insights in stakeholder workshops to secure alignment on prioritising UX impact over narrow technical expediency.

  • Collaborated with engineering to strike the right balance between development dependencies and interface improvements.

  • Convened a high-energy, three-day design sprint: engaging 10 cross-functional stakeholders: to co-create bold “one UI” concepts.

  • Rapidly built interactive Figma prototypes for moderated usability tests, iterating with direct business feedback to refine a solution that felt both visionary and eminently practical.

  • Initiated with in-depth user interviews and contextual shadowing, distilling thousands of post-its through affinity mapping to surface critical workflow bottlenecks.

  • Presented these insights in stakeholder workshops to secure alignment on prioritising UX impact over narrow technical expediency.

  • Collaborated with engineering to strike the right balance between development dependencies and interface improvements.

  • Convened a high-energy, three-day design sprint: engaging 10 cross-functional stakeholders: to co-create bold “one UI” concepts.

  • Rapidly built interactive Figma prototypes for moderated usability tests, iterating with direct business feedback to refine a solution that felt both visionary and eminently practical.

Options that could possibly solve the problems
One of the user in a design workshop
03

Outcome

Outcome

Delivered a unified web interface where planners access all tools: route planner, profitability calculator, and optimisation engine: through contextual tabs that share data (stops, dates, routes) without re-entry. Integrated an operations-research algorithm for schedule optimisation, displaying before-and-after comparisons with clear visual highlights of changes.

Final design component details
To be used on two 24" external screens
Presentation about unification of tools on company event
04

Learnings

Learnings

  1. Realised colleagues may hesitate to critique internal tools, so conducted extensive shadowing, contextual inquiry, and analytics tracking to uncover true pain points.

  2. Discovered the power of analogies: using film-editing and music-production software as inspiration: to help stakeholders envision a cohesive “one UI” despite disparate backend systems.

  3. We also extended the company’s passenger-focused design system with custom components for complex internal workflows and onboarded domain frontend teams to share code, accelerating development and fostering reuse.

Design is Human

© 2025 Design is Human

All rights reserved. Images, case studies, and design work shown are proprietary and may not be reproduced without explicit permission.

Design is Human

© 2025 Design is Human

All rights reserved. Images, case studies, and design work shown are proprietary and may not be reproduced without explicit permission.

Design is Human

© 2025 Design is Human

All rights reserved. Images, case studies, and design work shown are proprietary and may not be reproduced without explicit permission.